Home  /  Resources & support  /  User Group meetings  /  2009 German Stata Users Group meeting

Last updated: 17 July 2009

2009 German Stata Users Group meeting

Friday, June 26, 2009

Photo: Rhine Valley

Universitätsclub Bonn e.V.
Konviktstr. 9
D-53113 Bonn
Germany

Proceedings


Between tables and graphs: A tutorial

Nicholas J. Cox
Durham University
The display of data or of results often entails the preparation of a variety of table-like graphs showing both text labels and numeric values. I will present basic techniques, tips, and tricks using both official Stata and various user-written commands. The main message is that whenever graph bar, graph dot, or graph box commands fail to give what you want, then you can knit your own customized displays by using twoway as a general framework.

Additional information
cox.zip

Causal inference with observational data: Regression discontinuity and other methods in Stata

Austin Nichols
Urban Institute
This overview of implementing quasi-experimental methods of estimating causal impacts (panel methods, matching estimators, instrumental variables, and regression discontinuity) emphasizes practical considerations and Stata-specific approaches. I pay particular attention to the regression discontinuity method, which seems to be less well-known in the larger community of Stata users, but is the most well regarded of the quasi-experimental methods in those circumstances where it is appropriate. We will also examine some examples of hybrid applications of these estimation techniques.

Additional information
nichols.pdf

Computing poverty measures with survey data

Philippe Van Kerm
CEPS/INSTEAD, Luxembourg
I discuss estimation of poverty measures from household survey data in Stata and show how to derive analytic standard errors that take into account survey design features. Where needed, standard errors are adjusted for the estimation of the poverty line as a fraction of the mean or median income. The linearization approach based on influence functions is generally applicable to many estimators.

Additional information
vankerm.pdf

Using and interpreting restricted cubic splines

Maarten Buis
Universität Tübingen, Institut für Soziologie
Sometimes one wants to model the effect of a variable as a nonlinear smooth curve. A convenient choice for such a curve is a restricted cubic spline. This option has existed in Stata for a while through user-written programs, but as of Stata 10, the mkspline command in combination with the cubic option has been implemented in official Stata. In this talk, I will briefly introduce splines and restricted cubic splines, but I will mainly focus on what happens after one has estimated a model with a restricted cubic spline, and in particular how the postrcspline package can help in the interpretation of the results.

Additional information
buis.pdf

Performing within and between analysis (WABA) in Stata

Sven-Oliver Spieß
University of Mannheim
The “fallacies of the wrong level” (e.g., ecological fallacy) are a concern in much of social-science research. When appropriate data are available, researchers frequently use intra-class correlations or ANOVAs to decide whether to use individual-level data or whether to aggregate and analyze data at some higher level, such as workgroups, schools, or locations to examine the associations among theoretical constructs. However, this approach disregards either lower-level information through aggregation or information on group membership by solely using individual-level data. Within and between analysis (WABA), on the other hand, provides a detailed picture of the correlation structure among constructs at different levels by partitioning correlations among constructs into between-groups and within-group components. WABA thus represents a more informative and efficient technique when interested in associations among constructs beyond mere within-group homogeneity. When dealing with more than two hierarchical levels, multiple within and between analysis indicates at which level associations are strongest. Therefore, WABA can also be fruitfully employed to inform model specification in HLM/MLM. In this presentation, I aim to outline the basic ideas and concepts of WABA and to introduce the user-written wabanova program to perform basic single and multiple WABA in Stata.

Additional information
spiess.pdf

Using Mata to work more effectively with Stata: A tutorial

Christopher F. Baum
Boston College
Stata’s matrix language, Mata, highlighted in Bill Gould’s Mata Matters columns in the Stata Journal, is very useful and powerful in its interactive mode. Stata users who write do-files or ado-files should gain an understanding of the Stata–Mata interface: how Mata may be called upon to do one or more tasks and return its results to Stata. Mata’s broad and extensible menu of functions offers assistance with many programming tasks, including many that are not matrix oriented. In this tutorial, I will present examples of how do-file and ado-file writers might effectively use Mata in their work.

Additional information
baum.pdf

The biplot command and software development at StataCorp

Magdalena Luniak
TU Berlin
In the summer of 2008, I had an opportunity to participate in the internship program at StataCorp. There I found that professional software development is much more than just programming. Programmers can learn a lot from the software development process at StataCorp.

One of the projects I worked on that summer is an enhancement of the biplot command. This is the topic of my presentation, and it will serve as a basis for sharing the experience I gained during my work at StataCorp.

Additional information
luniak.pdf

Reproducible research: Weaving with Stata

Bill Rising
StataCorp
Reproducible research is one of many names for the same concept: writing a single report document that contains both the report and the commands needed to produce the results and graphics contained in the report. It is called reproducible research because any interested researcher can then reproduce the entire report from the one document. (Programmers call this same concept “literate programming”.) The utility of reproducible research documents extends far beyond research or programming. They allow rapid updates should there be additional data. They can also be used in teaching for generating differing examples or test questions, because different parameters will generate different examples. In this presentation, I will show you how to use a third-party application to embed Stata code, as well as its output, in either LaTeX or OpenOffice documents. I will also use example documents (including the talk itself) to show how you can update a report, its results, and its graphics by using new data or changing parameters.

Additional information
rising.zip

Creating LaTeX documents from within Stata

Benn Jann
ETH Zurich
In this presentation, I present a new user package called texdoc. texdoc can be used to create a LaTeX document from within Stata in a weaving fashion. This is especially useful if you want to produce a LaTeX document that contains Stata output, such as a Stata Journal article or solutions to statistics homework assignments. I will provide examples illustrating the usage of texdoc.

Additional information
jann.pdf

Using remote access to big datasets efficiently with Stata

Volker Lang
University of Tübingen
In this talk, I discuss problems experienced and solutions developed with Stata, using remote access to a big dataset (around 10GB) of the Institute for Employment Research (IAB). I focus on two topics. The first problem is that of not directly controlling the data. The solution here is to implement good pre-documentation into the do-files to structure and improve the communication with the people hosting the remote access. Second, there are memory and running-time problems with using such a large dataset; I discuss this problem in relation to the first one. The solution here is the extensive use of sampling techniques. I present routines for entering such sampling procedures into remote-access do-files.

Additional information
lang.pdf

Scientific organizers

Johannes Giesecke, University of Mannheim
[email protected]

Ulrich Kohler, WZB
[email protected]

Nikos Askitas, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA)
[email protected]

Logistics organizers

The conference is sponsored and organized by Dittrich and Partner (http://www.dpc.de), the distributor of Stata in several countries, including Germany, Austria, and Hungary.