Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances? |

Date |
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:31:57 +0200 |

Merci beaucoup - thank you. On 3/21/13, Carlo Lazzaro <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> wrote: > Dear Gwinyai, > the complexity of your seemingly simple model rests on the fact that one > predictor is not enough to explain differences in delivery mode. > I can bet that no researcher of no reserch field hopes to be successful in > publishing a one-predictor logistic regression model. > In case you did not perform it yet, I would suggest to take a look (via > PubMed or Medline) at what others have published on this topic in the past > and the methods they follow. > For instance, the following key-word: determinants AND caesarean AND > delivery in PubMed give me back 90 results (and part of them can be > downloaded in extenso free of charge from journals website): some articles > can be of interest for your research purposes. > Best regards, > Carlo > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Gwinyai Masukume > Inviato: giovedì 21 marzo 2013 12:18 > A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Oggetto: Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances? > > Carlo. Thanks once again. Well, an apparently simple mode of delivery which > has 2 possible outcomes is turning out to be far more complex than I > anticipated. > With gratitude, > Gwinyai > > On 3/21/13, Carlo Lazzaro <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> wrote: >> Dear Gwinyai, >> if you prefer to avoid a discussion about the indications for >> C/section, you can consider some hospital features as predictors >> instead (e.g.: public or private; teaching hospital or else; number of >> beds of the obstetrics unit grouped in different categories (0-10; >> .....); number of births per year grouped in different categories; >> ...). >> Kind regards, >> Carlo >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Gwinyai >> Masukume >> Inviato: mercoledě 20 marzo 2013 22:07 >> A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> Oggetto: Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal >> variances? >> >> Carlo - thanks, i was skeptical about going into a discussion about >> the indications for C/section which can be relative or absolute; >> maternal, fetal or materno-fetal. >> >> Austin - thanks for the link and pointing out that a pseudo R2 should >> not be a worry. by increasing the sample size a thousand fold i guess >> what that which is being detected is so small that in the end it's not >> worth it (detecting something so small)? >> >> Thanks all round. Appreciated. >> >> G >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> >> >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>

**Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>

**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?***From:*"Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Alternatives to box plots** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: Routine for merging many text-files** - Previous by thread:
**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?** - Next by thread:
**R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?** - Index(es):