Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?


From   Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
Date   Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:07:09 +0200

Carlo - thanks, i was skeptical about going into a discussion about
the indications for C/section which can be relative or absolute;
maternal, fetal or materno-fetal.

Austin - thanks for the link and pointing out that a pseudo R2 should
not be a worry. by increasing the sample size a thousand fold i guess
what that which is being detected is so small that in the end it's not
worth it (detecting something so small)?

Thanks all round. Appreciated.

G
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index