Carlo. Thanks once again. Well, an apparently simple mode of delivery
which has 2 possible outcomes is turning out to be far more complex
than I anticipated.
With gratitude,
Gwinyai
On 3/21/13, Carlo Lazzaro <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
> Dear Gwinyai,
> if you prefer to avoid a discussion about the indications for C/section,
> you
> can consider some hospital features as predictors instead (e.g.: public or
> private; teaching hospital or else; number of beds of the obstetrics unit
> grouped in different categories (0-10; .....); number of births per year
> grouped in different categories; ...).
> Kind regards,
> Carlo
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Gwinyai Masukume
> Inviato: mercoledě 20 marzo 2013 22:07
> A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Oggetto: Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
>
> Carlo - thanks, i was skeptical about going into a discussion about the
> indications for C/section which can be relative or absolute; maternal,
> fetal
> or materno-fetal.
>
> Austin - thanks for the link and pointing out that a pseudo R2 should not
> be
> a worry. by increasing the sample size a thousand fold i guess what that
> which is being detected is so small that in the end it's not worth it
> (detecting something so small)?
>
> Thanks all round. Appreciated.
>
> G
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
