Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Re: problem with ivregress

From   DE SOUZA Eric <>
To   "" <>
Subject   RE: st: Re: problem with ivregress
Date   Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:10:25 +0100

But you do not tell us whether the results for -ivreg- and -ivreg2- were the same.

Eric de Souza
College of Europe
Brugge (Bruges), Belgium

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
Sent: 16 February 2011 15:49
Subject: Re: st: Re: problem with ivregress

Thank you for the suggestion. In fact, the results for -ivreg- and
-ivregress- were not the same. I have contacted technical support for this matter.

Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Christopher Baum <> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Jorge wrote:
>> Can someone provide a hint
>> about why this might be happenning?
> Suggest you reestimate with -ivreg- (sic). If the results from ivreg agree with those of B-S-S ivreg2 (as they should) then bring this to the attention of Stata Tech Support, as it could be an ivregress bug (especially as you are getting the same FSRs from ivregress and ivreg2). Stata's own ivreg and ivregress commands should agree with each other.
> Kit
> Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   
>                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |   
>   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index