Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: problem with ivregress
From
Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Re: problem with ivregress
Date
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:49:03 -0500
Thank you for the suggestion. In fact, the results for -ivreg- and
-ivregress- were not the same. I have contacted technical support for
this matter.
_______________________
Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Christopher Baum <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Jorge wrote:
>
>> Can someone provide a hint
>> about why this might be happenning?
>
> Suggest you reestimate with -ivreg- (sic). If the results from ivreg agree with those of B-S-S ivreg2 (as they should) then bring this to the attention of Stata Tech Support, as it could be an ivregress bug (especially as you are getting the same FSRs from ivregress and ivreg2). Stata's own ivreg and ivregress commands should agree with each other.
>
> Kit
>
> Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
> An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
> An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/