Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Tom <tommedema@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: xtlogit: panel data transformation's recast to double makes model incomputable |
Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:13:39 +0200 |
Hi Nick, They are time series. `tsset` returns: panel variable: ticker_id (unbalanced) time variable: date, 101 to 532 delta: 1 unit Each group has its own continuous time frame, ranging from 101 to 532 (the first 100 dates have been dropped because they were required to create lagged variables). The only issue that I could possible see arising from time series is that the dates are not "synchronised" inbetween groups. With this I mean that t == 200 is a different point in time for id == 1 than t == 200 for the group with id == 2. But I don't think time series are the issue because clogit is not using them (it only uses the panel id variable), and it is returning exactly the same results as xtlogit. I was hoping that something obvious would arise from the many log files I submitted a couple of posts back :) Tom On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > As if there weren't enough problems, what is the assumption here about > time series structure? I may have missed something in a complicated > thread, but the original data look like time series to me. > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/