Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Tim Evans <[email protected]> |

To |
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit |

Date |
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:58:15 +0100 |

Maarten/Nick, Thanks for your helpful comments and Nick I take on board your comment about the model being poorly reporting if not all predictors are given appropriate attention - I'm just using it as a quick way of looking at the data. However, the tips you have both given should be valuable elsewhere. Best wishes Tim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox Sent: 25 August 2011 14:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit A very bad idea in my view. A model is not fairly reported if you don't pay attention to all its predictors. But you can always go -yla(1/`=_N')-. Nick On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Tim Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > Nick, Maarten > > I think I have what I want now and agree that the graphical presentation is nicer/easier to interpret. Thanks for your help. > > However, I think I have one final thing to achieve. I only want to plot the variables that have significant p values - this is fine as I can drop them at the end of the code: > > replace parm = "baseline odds" if parm == "_cons" > drop if p <=0.05 > egen axis= axis(z), label(parm) > > > However I want to incorporate into the graph code the fact that the signifcant number of variables may change between each regression so the 'ylab(1/14, valuelabel ang(h) noticks' command may change so that I have 12 variables rather than 14 in another regression - but I'd like Stata to do this rather than me having to pick out the number after each regression as I have a number of regressions to do. > > > **BEGIN EXAMPLE**** > twoway bar estimate axis, xscale(log) base(1) horizontal barw(.5) /// > xline(1) ylab(1/14, valuelabel ang(h) noticks) || /// > rcap min95 max95 axis, horizontal /// > legend(order(1 "point estimate" /// > 2 "95% conf. int.") pos(6)) /// > xtitle("odds ratio") ytitle("") > ***END EXAMPLE*** > > Best wishes > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maarten Buis > Sent: 25 August 2011 09:30 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> Thanks for the help again. I've tried your example below, but it fails on the following code: >> >> parmest, norestore eform >> Invalid estimates matrix: e(b) >> last estimates not found >> r(301); > > The example works on my computer, which makes it hard to diagnose the > problem. Did you run the entire example (including the -logit- model)? > Do you have the latest version of -parmest-? I got mine by typing -ssc > install parmest, replace-. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ _DISCLAIMER: This email and any attachments hereto contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be confidential or legally privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient(s), please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely on this e-mail or any attachments, as this may be unlawful. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Maarten Buis <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Maarten Buis <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Maarten Buis <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Maarten Buis <[email protected]>

**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Maarten Buis <[email protected]>

**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Tim Evans <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Problem with Recognizing User Written Programs** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Problem with Recognizing User Written Programs** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Useful labelling of dummy variables following logit** - Index(es):