Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: r(610)

From   "POPE, REBECCA" <[email protected]>
To   "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: r(610)
Date   Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:08:18 -0600

Thanks for the heads-up Mark. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schaffer, Mark E
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: r(610)

The most important reason imho isn't in Nick's list: precision in
-outsheet- is determined by display format (!), and if you don't realise
this, the consequences are nasty.  I was bitten by this recently:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 4:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: r(610)
> Using -saveold- is indeed generally preferable to exporting the data
> as a text file for precisely the reasons you identified, the likely
> loss of e.g. variable labels, display formats, characteristics
> (including notes).
> Nick
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:56 PM, POPE, REBECCA <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I saw Nick's post mentioning both solutions, as well as 
> Aggie's follow-up question about insheeting. However, I 
> didn't see a post noting the virtues of one approach over the 
> other, which seemed relevant. If Nick already posted that, it 
> didn't arrive on my end & I apologize to the list for being 
> duplicative. I'll try to catch it in the archives later.
> >
> > If you were referring only to Nick's post about potential 
> solutions and nothing was posted about why Aggie might want 
> to ask her friend to use -saveold- instead of the 
> -outsheet/insheet-, I would truly appreciate feedback on my 
> view of _why_ it would be preferable for Aggie to ask her 
> friend to use -saveold-. I ask this as much for my 
> edification as a Stata user (since I frequently use 
> -saveold-) as for Aggie's information.
> >
> > Here is the text from my original post:
> > "I'm away from my computer right now so if someone else 
> could confirm that would be great, but I think that would 
> preserve any formatting, labels, notes, etc that Aggie's 
> friend had applied to the data. That would save Aggie 
> duplicating any pre-analysis prep work."
> >
> > p.s. I read the help guide when I got back to my office and 
> it only explicitly mentions labels. The woman I normally send 
> the data sets to isn't in yet, so I can't confirm formats and 
> notes myself as a benefit of -saveold- over -outsheet/insheet-.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rebecca
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Neil Shephard
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:41 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: st: r(610)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, POPE, REBECCA 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> If Aggie is already asking her friend to send a new data 
> set, is it preferable for her to ask for her friend to save 
> the existing Stata set using the -saveold- command?
> >
> > Thats what Nick had suggested in his first reply in this thread.
> >
> > Aggie then asked how to read text files, hence the suggestions.
> >
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.

*   For searches and help try:
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message..

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index