Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Re: st: no room to add more double literals |
| Date | Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:23:08 -0500 |
<>
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Sergiy wrote:
> What is the best way to define, e.g. 100000x1 matrix in the Mata code?
> (Another software is writing the Mata program, so I am not concerned
> about the amount of labor).
Why not just define the matrix (or the vec() of the matrix) as a Stata variable and view it in Mata?
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/