Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: st: no room to add more double literals


From   Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: Re: st: no room to add more double literals
Date   Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:23:08 -0500

<>
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Sergiy wrote:

> What is the best way to define, e.g. 100000x1 matrix in the Mata code?
> (Another software is writing the Mata program, so I am not concerned
> about the amount of labor).

Why not just define the matrix (or the vec() of the matrix) as a Stata variable and view it in Mata?

Kit

Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index