Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Sample Weights
From
"Jason Dean, Mr" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Sample Weights
Date
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:15:12 -0500
I'd just like to thank everyone for their help. Your comments are extremely helpful.
Jason
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael I. Lichter [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Sample Wegihts
Thanks, Stas, for the clarification and references. I am dealing with a
related weighting problem where I want to combine an overall sample and
with a local-area oversample, so this is helpful.
Michael
Stas Kolenikov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:45 PM, G. Dai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> hi Jason, the weighting strategy you proposed might not be appropriate.
>> The function of weight is to represent the population and to satisfy the
>> need of sampling method adjusting.
>>
>
>
> On weights in principle:
> http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/article/1036965
>
> On oversampling, including combinations of different frames:
> http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=12-001-X200900211036&lang=eng
>
>
--
Michael I. Lichter, Ph.D. <[email protected]>
Research Assistant Professor & NRSA Fellow
UB Department of Family Medicine / Primary Care Research Institute
UB Clinical Center, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY 14215
Office: CC 126 / Phone: 716-898-4751 / FAX: 716-898-3536
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/