 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: New rules
I have been dismayed to see the fighting that has happened over the last few months.
Do we not have a method by which we can remove a member ("ban") similar to declaring a person's submissions to be spam? I routinely do this for the Viagra or Cialis solicitations (although I must admit I was amused by one company offering "soft" versions of these products - why??)
I'm not sure the screening will work - someone can log in and later become a pain in the neck. The solution is to give them one or two warnings about inappropriate mail and then BOOM!
Tony
Peter A. Lachenbruch
Department of Public Health
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone: 541-737-3832
FAX: 541-737-4001
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcello Pagano
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: New rules
Dear Listers,
My apologies for allowing the tenor of the list to degrade. We have now
made a change to see if we can stop this from happening again. For
those currently on the list the change will not affect you other than
you will possibly experience an improved tenor. New subscribers will
have to go through a screening process that will add time, hopefully
less than a day, before they can subscribe. The screening process is
designed to keep some, hopefully very few, people out.
Thank you all for your patience while we cleared this mess up. Let us
hope things revert to normal where the worst we should expect is a
scolding from Nick.
Keep on listing!
m.p.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/