Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: clogit or logistic for matched pairs

From   Joseph Coveney <>
To   Statalist <>
Subject   Re: st: clogit or logistic for matched pairs
Date   Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:34:34 +0900

Jay Kaufman wrote (excerpted):


Stata appears to have no built-in functions for matched COHORT data (as
opposed to matched case-control data) but the relevant formulas ar shown in
Rothman & Greenland "Modern Epidemiology 2nd Edition, p. 283 (i.e. for the
Mantel-Haenszel RR instead of M-H OR as provided in Stata's -mhodds-

However, the M-H RR is equal to the crude RR exactly because matching in a
COHORT study (as opposed to a case-control study) adjusts for confounding by
the matching factor.  See discussion in R & G 1998 pp. 283-285.


In lieu of a Mantel-Haenszel command for risk ratio in Stata, I suppose that
you could try something like -gllamm/xtgee , i(pair) family(binomial)
link(log) eform- in a pinch, but is there a reason to prefer risk ratios
over odds ratios?  Is it for ease of interpretation?  I don't have Rothman
and Greenland's text, but it seems from Jay's post that they abide by the
convention of odds ratios for case-control studies, risk ratios for cohort
studies.  Does that represent universal thinking among experts currently for
analysis and reporting of cohort studies with a binomial outcome?  I just
was under the impression that odds ratios were a more "natural" metric for
this kind of data regardless of whether from a case-control or cohort

Joseph Coveney

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2023 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index