[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Eva Poen" <eva.poen@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable |

Date |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:10:14 +0100 |

-egen, max()- allowes -by-. I.e. it can do more than just create a constant. A local can only hold one number/string. You are right about the single variable in -egen, max()-. -egen, rowmax()- does the same for a list of variables. Generally, you will just have to get used to the fact that -egen- functions are only available within egen. Most of what you want to do can be done in two lines (as opposed to one line as you are proposing), so it's really not too much extra effort. Btw, I second Maarten's recommendation of the NetCourses. They are excellent. Eva 2008/10/3 Ashim Kapoor <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>: > On 2nd thought. > > egen j=max(x) DOES NOT take more than one variable. > > It is gen which can do the max of 2 or more variables. > > So since egen returns a variable with ONE constant value, it would > seem that it should be allowed to be stored in a scalar / local macro. > > Thank you, > Ashim. > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Ashim Kapoor <ashimkapoor@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ahh I see what you are saying. For multiple variables it won't work. I >> usually use it to find the max of ONE variable. I guess that confused >> me. >> >> Thank you, >> Ashim. >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Eva Poen <eva.poen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2008/10/3 Ashim Kapoor <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> And I am still puzzled as to why someone would not allow us to set >>>> local j=max(list) >>>> cos that seems intuitive. >>> >>> If the list includes variable names, how is Stata supposed to know >>> which observation's maximum you mean? -egen- is meant to work with >>> variables. -egen- functions are not available outside -egen. >>> >>> On the other hand, there are Stata functions (-help functions-) which >>> will work in general expressions. Therefore, >>> >>> local j = max(4, 92, -35, 399, 0) >>> >>> will correctly store 399 in local macro j. >>> >>> Eva * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Eva Poen" <eva.poen@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable***From:*"Ashim Kapoor" <ashimkapoor@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: corr_svy & covariance matrix for survey data** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Re: saving memory local vs usual variable** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |