Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: Oxaca decomposition with heckman
From
"Rubil Ivica" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: Oxaca decomposition with heckman
Date
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:53:15 +0100
Fabrizio,
why don't you first estimate the lambda separately and just use it as an additional covariate in -oaxaca-?
ir
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fabrizio Colella - 1348010
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Oxaca decomposition with heckman
Dear Statalist,
I would like to perform an Oaxaca-Blinder Wage Decomposition comparing hourly wage of part-time and full-time employees.
Moreover, I want to perform an Heckman model with a selection regarding the choices of workers among part-time, full-time and non-employment at the first step.
It seems it is impossible to achieve my goal using directly the command "Oaxaca" because the dependent variable at the first stage of the Heckman model is the same I have entered in the section "by(...)" of the Oaxaca structure.
Any suggestions?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Fabrizio
------------------------------------------
Fabrizio Colella
Bocconi University and
Fondazione Rodolfo DeBenedetti
Milan, Italy
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/