Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]> |

To |
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13? |

Date |
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:55:45 -0500 |

Right, SPSS does have some sort of machine learning/data mining toolkit. Their business model though is that of base SPSS for a base price, plus anything extra at an extra price, and I am pretty sure that the CART module would have to be purchased separately. -- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC) -- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI -- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the position of my employer -- http://stas.kolenikov.name On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Stas. I imagine your answer summarises well the social and > personal reasons behind many choices. > > There are always plenty such. For example, I don't use R over Stata > because I invested far too much time, energy and affection in learning > Stata to want to throw that away, long before R was evident. > > On the more technical aside, one user privately pointed to > classification and regression trees as a strength of SPSS. > Nick > [email protected] > > > On 15 October 2013 17:26, Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nick, it's a matter of habit, for the most part, I believe. It has >> traditionally been used by social scientists who collect their data, >> as it seems to have some sort of a data collection toolkit (which I >> have never used). People like the GUI... and you have even save the >> syntax from your point and click operations for later use! So that's >> as far as the strengths go. Some of the tabulations can be adjusted >> for a prettier output more conveniently than in Stata, though. >> >> Your question sounds a lot like "what drives people to use Stata if >> they also have access to R?" that we both have heard a lot on >> StackOverflow ;). So that's a disciplinary divide. A machine learning >> blogger would insert a snippet of R code into their post to clarify >> what they want to say without much thinking whether a different >> software may exist. An economist would insert a snippet of Stata code, >> as that is the language economists think in. Along these lines, public >> opinion researchers think in terms of SPSS syntax. >> >> -- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC) >> -- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI >> -- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the >> position of my employer >> -- http://stas.kolenikov.name >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Not to knock SPSS, although for many that qualifies as an acceptable >>> sport, but what drives people to use SPSS if they also have access to >>> Stata? >>> >>> I am not trying to be ironic here. It is (literally) decades, i.e. >>> sometime last century I think, since I last used SPSS, so I am quite >>> out of touch on its relative strengths. >>> >>> Please take as understood that some users prefer its user interface. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nick >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> On 15 October 2013 16:05, Sergiy Radyakin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Stas, >>>> >>>> Stata 8 and 9 share the same data format (specification 113), so >>>> although SPSS says it writes in 5-8, it should equally read and write >>>> 9 (perhaps the menu text was designed at the time Stata 9 did not >>>> exist yet). Here is another reference it supports 9: >>>> http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mult_pkg/faq/fromStata_toSPSS.htm >>>> >>>> But introduction of reading Stata dataset capability was apparently >>>> added in version 14 (contrary to the above reference): >>>> http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/spssstat/v20r0m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.spss.statistics.help%2Fwhatsnew_14.0.htm >>>> >>>> Furthermore, it seems the request for support of newer Stata formats >>>> was requested still in the 17th generation of SPSS: >>>> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21477575 >>>> >>>> Best, Sergiy Radyakin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Sergiy, >>>>> >>>>> regarding 2), I have access at work to SPSS 21 that seems to work with >>>>> Stata 8 files (at least their internal "Save As" gives options from >>>>> Stata 5 through Stata 8). From Stata 12 that I have at work, the >>>>> -save-d files (under version 12) cannot be read by SPSS, but -saveold- >>>>> produces the version-8-compatible data set that SPSS can work with. >>>>> >>>>> -- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC) >>>>> -- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI >>>>> -- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the >>>>> position of my employer >>>>> -- http://stas.kolenikov.name >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Sergiy Radyakin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hello Marco, >>>>>> >>>>>> could you please explain a bit, why you see a need for such a program? >>>>>> If you have Stata 13, this means you can use -saveold- to save in the >>>>>> previous version, then following this FAQ all the way until version 5 >>>>>> if necessary: >>>>>> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data-management/save-for-previous-version/ >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't have Stata 13, then you use -use13- to load the data into >>>>>> Stata 10 or later. >>>>>> http://radyakin.org/transfer/use13/use13.htm >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So I see potential clients as: >>>>>> 1) people having Stata 9 and no access to newer versions; >>>>>> 2) people having non-Stata software that can read dta format of 9, but >>>>>> not newer and the software is not going to be updated, and there is no >>>>>> access to Stata 10+ >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding 1) I was told the # is pretty small, but I don't know what >>>>>> 'small' really is. Regarding 2) I am interested in what is out there >>>>>> (regardless whether maintained or not). Can we have a headcount of the >>>>>> programs that directly read Stata datasets? Let me start: >>>>>> ADePT v.5.50.5001.23617 (supports data from Stata 8 to 13) >>>>>> ADePT Map v2 (supports data from Stata 8-11) >>>>>> R (with package foreign) (supports data from Stata 5 to 12) >>>>>> SPSS v.15+ (supports data from Stata X?X to 9?) >>>>>> Stat/Transfer (supports data from any version of Stata) >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding the implementation it is not at all difficult: the current >>>>>> code of use13 and use10 contains all the necessary procedures to >>>>>> implement save9 which I can do if there is any significant demand. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, Sergiy Radyakin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Marco Ercolani <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Dear Statalisters, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am asking for suggestions on how I can re-program -save9- so that it will work in Stata 13. >>>>>>> In other words, so it will save data in a Stata 9 format from within Stata 13. >>>>>>> I can think of two possible strategies to achieve this within Stata 13: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Strategy 1: Edit the contents of the dataset so they conform to Stata 9 protocols, save the file, >>>>>>> then edit the the file header so that it appears to have been saved by Stata 9. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Strategy 2: Use an existing save facility in Stata 13 that would allow me to impose limits on the >>>>>>> data so it respects Stata 9 protocols. Does such a save facility exist? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any help on the above two approaches or helpful suggestions for a "third way" would be welcome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Marco Ercolani >>>>>>> Department of Economics >>>>>>> University of Birmingham >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * For searches and help try: >>>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>>>>> * >>>>>> * For searches and help try: >>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>>>> * >>>>> * For searches and help try: >>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>>> * >>>> * For searches and help try: >>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Marco Ercolani <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Sergiy Radyakin <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Sergiy Radyakin <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>

**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?** - Next by Date:
**AW: st: Estiamtes save multiple equations** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: How to re-program -save9- for Stata 13?** - Index(es):