Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Reference group for categorical interactions


From   David Hoaglin <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Reference group for categorical interactions
Date   Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:40:58 -0400

Norton's comment about odds ratios being conditional on the data and
the model applies equally to the regression coefficients in a multiple
regression.  From reading only the abstract, I don't know whether he
makes that connection.

David Hoaglin

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:11 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> The debate about the relative usefulness of odds ratios and marginal effects will run and run, and for some good reasons.
>
> Nonetheless, for some strongly expressed views that are counter to Maarten's, and which I have some sympathy with, have a look at:
>
> "Log Odds and Ends", by Edward C. Norton, NBER Working Paper No. 18252, http://www.nber.org/papers/w18252
> Inter alia, Norton states in his abstract " There is no one odds ratio ..."
>
> Stephen
> ------------------
> Stephen P. Jenkins <[email protected]>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index