Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: the memory footprint and execution speed of -mf_quadcross()-


From   László Sándor <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: the memory footprint and execution speed of -mf_quadcross()-
Date   Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:52:39 -0400

I checked some of Bill's resources on precision (e.g.
http://blog.stata.com/2012/04/02/the-penultimate-guide-to-precision/),
and -mf_quadcross()- is always mentioned as an option, possibly
overkill, but without much guidance on what the costs of its use might
be in terms of memory or execution speed.

If my code uses the function many times on humungous st_views, was it
a bad idea to use quadcross()? Probably it was — but how bad?

Thanks,

Laszlo

PS: I must wonder about the usefulness of all my questions if they
attract few comments. Thanks for bearing with me anyway.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index