Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: When is 'no trimming' performed using metatrim
From
Setor Kunutsor <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: When is 'no trimming' performed using metatrim
Date
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:17:10 +0000
Can you be a bit specific as I am not sure what you refer to. This is the first time am using statalist
-Setor
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maarten Buis
Sent: 26 February 2013 14:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: When is 'no trimming' performed using metatrim
That is not sufficient information. See the Statalist FAQ for several examples of what is needed.
We don't do this because we are mean (we may or may not be but that is for others to deside) but because there are often multiple version of user written software floating around in cyberspace and it helps if we are talking about the same program. You have given us the author, but that typically remains constant over versions, so that does not help us resolve this issue.
-- Maarten
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Setor Kunutsor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Metatrim (author: Thomas J. Steichen, RJRT, [email protected])
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: 24 February 2013 14:13
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: When is 'no trimming' performed using metatrim
>
> Please explain where user-written commands you refer to come from.
>
> Nick
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Setor Kunutsor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have conducted a meta-analysis based on a total of 10 studies using a Random-effects model. There was substantial heterogeneity among contributing studies (I2>70%).
>>
>> A funnel plot revealed evidence of publication bias which was further confirmed by Egger's regression symmetry test (P=0.03).
>>
>> I am using the trim-and-fill method to adjust for publication bias. I am aware this method performs poorly in the presence of substantial between study heterogeneity.
>>
>> On running the metatrim command, the output suggests that no trimming was performed.
>>
>> What does this mean? Does it mean there was no publication bias? How do I interpret the results?
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/