Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Areg, absorb vs. xtreg, fe

From   Katherine Meckel <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Areg, absorb vs. xtreg, fe
Date   Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:43:12 -0500


I've seen in the archives that the difference between -areg, absorb-
and -xtreg, fe- has been visited before, but I didn't see answer to
the following:

there are several ways to obtain the OLS estimator in a fixed effects
model--does anyone know which models AREG and XTREG use?  Is it least
squares dummy variables (LSDV) or a mean-differenced model, e.g.?

I am also wondering, relatedly, if someone can explain why the -areg-
help file says the following:
areg is designed for datasets with many groups, but not a number of
groups that increases with the sample size.

The reason I ask is because there are different finite sample
adjustments for standard errors in fixed effects models depending on
whether you are using LSDV or mean-differencing and I don't think
XTREG uses any sample adjustment in their standard errors.

Thanks very much for your help, Katherine

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index