Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Breanna Pellegrini" <breanna.pellegrini@rmit.edu.au> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: Generating Murphy-Topel standard errors in Stata |

Date |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:08:40 +1000 |

Dear Statalist, I have a two-step estimation setup where the first stage is modelled using a binary probit specification. I then use the predicted values from the first stage model as an explanatory regressor in the second stage. The second stage is estimated using a linear regression model. Since I have included a generated regressor in the second stage, the standard errors from the second stage model will need to be adjusted using the Murphy-Topel variance estimator. The Stata Journal paper by Hole (2006) titled "Calculating Murphy-Topel variance estimates in Stata: A simplified procedure" (http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0114) provides Stata code for calculating the Murphy-Topel standard errors for a two-step model with a logit model in the first stage and then a Poisson model in the second stage. Additional code changes are also suggested for a number of variations to the model specification at both stages of estimation. I have been able to adapt the code from Hole (2006) for my particular model setup and the code runs fine and Murphy-Topel standard errors are produced. However, specific code amendments for the situation of having a linear regression model in the second stage were not discussed in the Hole (2006) paper. So I am a little unsure as to whether I have properly amended my code for the setup of a probit model in the first stage and a linear regression model in the second stage. In particular: 1) When calculating the score for the second stage linear regression model can I directly use the second stage code used in Hole (2006, pp. 523) and simply replace "poisson" with "regress"? 2) Would I need to also adjust the C-matrix and R-matrix calculations to take into account the residual variance parameter in the linear regression model? Hole (2006) discusses how to account for the auxiliary (dispersion) parameter if a negative binomial model is estimated in the second stage, but how would this be done in a linear regression setup? 3) In both stages of my estimation I am also using clustered standard errors to allow for intra-group correlation between twenty different regional sites. Are there any further code adjustments I would need to make to calculate the Murphy-Topel estimates in this case? Any guidance from those who may have previous experience in dealing with and coding the Murphy-Topel variance estimates would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Breanna Breanna Pellegrini School of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University 379-405 Russell Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Tel +61 3 9925 0944 Fax +61 3 9925 5986 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Generating Murphy-Topel standard errors in Stata***From:*Cameron McIntosh <cnm100@hotmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: New module: mvdcmp** - Next by Date:
**st: Assistance regarding a maximum likelihood model** - Previous by thread:
**st: SSC Archive updates** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Generating Murphy-Topel standard errors in Stata** - Index(es):