Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | christina sakali <christina.sakali@googlemail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Testing for serial correlation in small panel samples |
Date | Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:09:37 +0300 |
Dear Scott, thanks a lot for the suggestion. I have a question though: Does the Bhargava et al's DW stat., reported by the -lbi- option, refer to the original xtreg regression or the xtregar one, which is corrected for first-order serial correlation? I guess what I need to know is: can I use the Bhargava stat. from the -lbi- option as an indication of serial correlation in my original xtreg regression or is this irrelevant? On 7 September 2011 00:32, Scott Merryman <scott.merryman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:22 AM, christina sakali > <christina.sakali@googlemail.com> wrote: > <snip> > >> For example is there a way to compute Bhargava's et al. (1982) DW >> stat. for panel data or Baltagi's (2001, p.94) LM test for first-order >> serial correlation in a fixed effects model? > > See -help xtregar- and the -lbi- option. > > Scott > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/