Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: Why does mkspline only have "restricted" cubic splines and what does it mean in practice? |
Date | Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:59:34 +0000 |
I see. Well, that certainly makes more sense. I was imagining human ages in years and something that hits people in their 50s, which is closer to home. But -- on the other hand -- you are expecting cubic splines to be good at modelling transient responses to stimuli. Remember that the function and first and second derivatives are continuous! Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Jen Zhen @ Nick: > I am really surprised that you feel you need so many knots, even if > you have ages that aren't integers in your data. I'd experiment with > far fewer, even for something variable like people retiring, or going > through the menopause, at different ages, or whatever your application > is. I wanted to use all these knots (the original variable age is measured to the day), because I know that in each interval between these knot points individuals receive a different treatment. My main interest is in the effect of that treatment, i.e. in the constants of the different intervals, and I would like to make sure to fully control for the effects of any factors also correlated with age, hence my decision to allow each interval to have a different slope. I hope that you will find the choice to make more sense then. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/