Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: main effect insignificant, interaction term significant
From
Gáti Annamária <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: main effect insignificant, interaction term significant
Date
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:13:46 +0100
Dear All,
I know that there is a never ending debate on this, but I am interested
in your opinion.
Do (and if so, how do) we interpret interaction terms in the following
regression example:
we want to explain whether someone got lung cancer or not and we explain
this by gender and smoking.
gender= non sign.
ever smoked= non sign.
gender*smoked= sign
annamaria
***
2011.02.16. 16:17 keltezéssel, Nick Cox írta:
I don't see a histogram. I see markers of different sizes and I don't know what the precise story is. Anyway, you can get some of the way there directly with something like
gen one = 1
label def one 1 "Econ 1 odd"
label val one one
scatter one myvar
or
graph7 myvar, oneway
or
you can look at e.g. -stripplot- (SSC).
Nick
[email protected]
Rilke Rainer Michael
does anyone know how to do such a graph: www.rainer-rilke.de/1.png ?
It seems to me that this is a scatter plot combined with a histogram. But I do not have a clue about how to implement such a thing in stata.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/