Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: FW: Marginal effects for the two-part model


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   RE: st: FW: Marginal effects for the two-part model
Date   Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:18:43 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Maarten buis wrote:
> The difference between that and your two-part model is
> that in that model the dependence is included by deriving
> the inverse Mill's ratio from the selection model, add it
> to the OLS model, and adjust the standard errors. 

Nick is in a pedantic mood today(*). He correctly pointed 
out to me privately that it is Mills' ratio and not Mill's
ratio. (And the moment he told me, I remembered that he 
made that point before, and at that time I made a mental note
not to make that mistake...
<http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-02/msg00945.html>)

-- Maarten

(*) but see the entry on pedantry in this glossary:
<http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-01/msg00003.html>

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index