Re: st: missing data?

[Sabrina Carrossa <carrossa@gmail.com>]

Thank you Maarten!

sabry

On 17 June 2010 14:55, Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 17/6/10, Sabrina Carrossa wrote:
>> On the one hand I would use the second Db (B) because it is
>> the only one that allow me to use the regional information in the
>> longitudinal database (while in the Db A I have the regional
>> information only in the cross-sectional one).
>>
>> On the other hand, I would like to be able to differentiate
>> those that have not a specific good because they can't affort it from
>> those that haven't a specific good for other reason.
>>
>> Do you think that appending the two Db (A and B) I can
>> estimate these values for the Db B such as in a missing data case?
>
> Yes, if you need a reference: Andrew Gelman; Gary King; Chuanhai Liu
> (1998) "Not Asked and Not Answered: Multiple Imputation for Multiple
> Surveys" Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443):
> 846-857.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Maarten
>
> --------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> --------------------------
>
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>



-- 
sabrina

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/