Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Sabrina Carrossa <carrossa@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: missing data? |
| Date | Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0100 |
Thank you Maarten! sabry On 17 June 2010 14:55, Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > --- On Thu, 17/6/10, Sabrina Carrossa wrote: >> On the one hand I would use the second Db (B) because it is >> the only one that allow me to use the regional information in the >> longitudinal database (while in the Db A I have the regional >> information only in the cross-sectional one). >> >> On the other hand, I would like to be able to differentiate >> those that have not a specific good because they can't affort it from >> those that haven't a specific good for other reason. >> >> Do you think that appending the two Db (A and B) I can >> estimate these values for the Db B such as in a missing data case? > > Yes, if you need a reference: Andrew Gelman; Gary King; Chuanhai Liu > (1998) "Not Asked and Not Answered: Multiple Imputation for Multiple > Surveys" Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443): > 846-857. > > Hope this helps, > Maarten > > -------------------------- > Maarten L. Buis > Institut fuer Soziologie > Universitaet Tuebingen > Wilhelmstrasse 36 > 72074 Tuebingen > Germany > > http://www.maartenbuis.nl > -------------------------- > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- sabrina * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/