Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Binary Variables
From
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Binary Variables
Date
Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:20:02 +0100
Another alternative is just to aggregate some regions. If the response is identical, you lose nothing, except that some thought needs to be given to the combination of predictor values for those regions. For example, is population weighting appropriate?
Nick
[email protected]
Maarten buis
--- On Wed, 2/6/10, Natalie Trapp wrote:
> I use a Dummy Variable for 150 regions within the EU27.
> When I regress the model, I use one region as a reference
> group, but Stata still automatically omits four to five more
> regions. Is it maybe because the regions are too similar in
> their characteristics so that I have to build groups of
> similar regions? Or is there another way how I can do the
> regression with all regions of interest?
This is a fixed effects regression (assuming you are using
linear regression, -regress-). This type of regression can
only make use of variation within a region, so if the dependent
variable is constant within a region, the region will be dropped.
Your alternative is to use random effects regression (see:
-help xtreg-), but that has disadvantages of its own. It is up
to you to decide which disadvantages you think are least bad...
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/