Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)
Date   Fri, 14 May 2010 16:46:26 +0200

<> 

In 10.1, I get the old behavior with -xtline-, and the new behavior, i.e.
respect for -cmissing()-, for -xtline2-
(http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-10/msg00291.html), just as
promised:


*************
clear*
vers 10.1

set obs 4
gen id=_n
expand 10
bys id: gen time=_n
gen x=runiform()
xtset id time
replace x=. if runiform()<.3


xtline x, cmissing(n) name(mygr, replace) nodraw
xtline2 x, cmissing(n) name(mygr2, replace) nodraw

graph combine mygr mygr2, col(1)
*************


In 11, both yield identical results.


HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Giovanni Vecchi
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 16:15
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)

Dear All,

following up on a couple of emails on the failure of -xtline- to account for
the -cmissing(n)- option
(http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-10/msg00291.html), I'm writing
to report that, in my experience, the bug in -xtline- has not been fixed.
Nor does -xtline2-, kindly provided by Jeff Pitblado, work for me.

After running a number of experiments under both Stata 10.1 and Stata 11,
I'm now short of ideas and seeking for your advice.

Giovanni


------------------------------------------------------------------
Giovanni Vecchi
Associate Professor
Department of Economics
University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

voice	+ 39 06 72595730
fax	+ 39 06 2020500
email	[email protected]
web	http://www.economia.uniroma2.it/vecchi/
-----------------------------------------------------------------


 

__________ Informazioni da ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versione del database delle
firme digitali 5115 (20100514) __________

Il messaggio e stato controllato da ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

www.nod32.it
 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index