Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-


From   Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm-
Date   Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:26:30 -0600

Why do you want to use -gllamm- for this? -biprobit- should be way faster.
It is probably doable, but you would need to impose some odd constraints
like unit loadings of the common latent variable in both equations.

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Dimitrije Tišma
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I was wondering if it is possible to do a bivariate probit regression
> using -gllamm- rather than the built-in comman -biprobit-. If yes,
> what would be the basic syntax? I have looked up everywhere (or at
> least I think I did), -gllamm- manual included, but haven´t found a
> lot on this. Thanks!
>

-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index