Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: GAM in survey commands |
| Date | Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:28:02 -0600 |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Priscilla Martinez < priscilla.martinez@medisin.uio.no> wrote: > I'm working on a complex survey sample and want to confirm that running a > generalized additive model is not feasible with survey commands? I've done > numerous searches and it seems so, but I want to make sure I'm not missing > something. > Depends on how you approach it. If you are using a 10-year old -gam- command by Patrick Royston, then the answer is no. If you produce your own basis functions and plug them into -regress- or -glm-, then of course that works fine with -svy- prefix. -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/