Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

R: Re: st: ordered probit


From   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   R: Re: st: ordered probit
Date   Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:23:29 +0100 (CET)

Thank you very much, it seems it works.

FF


>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: [email protected]
>Data: 05/02/2010 13.56
>A: <[email protected]>
>Ogg: Re: st: ordered probit
>
>1) Try -oglm, hetero()- (SSC) due to Richard Williams.
>
>T
>
>2010/2/5 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
>> Dear statalisters
>>
>> I would like to ask you two points about ordered probit:
>>
>> 1)Is it possible to define variables to be included in the variance
>> specification like in the hetprobit command?
>> 2)Residuals provided by oprobit postestimation are not generalized 
residuals,
>> isn't it?How are they compute?
>>
>> Thank you for any help.
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>To every ω-consistent recursive class κ of formulae there correspond
>recursive class signs r, such that neither v Gen r nor Neg(v Gen r)
>belongs to Flg(κ) (where v is the free variable of r).
>
>*
>*   For searches and help try:
>*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index