[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: selection correction in survival models

From   "Murali Kuchibhotla" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: selection correction in survival models
Date   Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:23:37 -0500 (CDT)

       Thank you for your suggestions. A follow up question-are you aware of 
the existence of Heckman style corrections in the context of duration


> Murali Kuchibhotla <[email protected]>:
> A better question might be: Is there a way to correct for this in the
> real world?  Probably not, in most senses.  Think of it as a
> logit/probit regressing "survival" on the k variables in X and a
> training dummy T and the k interactions T*X, so you have at least k+1
> endogenous variables measuring the effects of training.  You could
> switch to an -ivprobit- model if you had a large number of
> instruments, but that seems unlikely (plus, I think you would want an
> -ivcloglog- command which does not exist).  One way forward is to
> reweight the samples so they look identical on observables, using
> propensity scores, as described in
> and elsewhere
> (the sample will look identical in the sense that a -hotelling- test
> would fail to reject the null that the mean of X is the same in the
> training group and the non-training group--the distributions may
> differ in other ways).  But this corrects only for selection on
> observables, not unobservable differences--for the latter, you need
> training to be randomly assigned, for a start.  Or you need a very
> convincing natural experiment.
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Murali Kuchibhotla
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >      I am interested in estimating separate Cox regression models for 2
> > groups of individuals- trainees and non-trainees. The problem is that the
> > training decision is endogenously determined, so that the differences
> > between the 2 sets of parameter estimates may well be driven by the
> > differences in the unobservable characteristics between the 2 groups of
> > respondents. Is there a way to correct for this in Stata?
> >
> > Murali Kuchibhotla
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

Murali Kuchibhotla
Department of Economics
Iowa State University

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index