Anyone from Stata want to chime in?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Martin Weiss
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, -reshape- is mentioned in the -whatsnew- of 11th of August 2008, but
> nothing in there points to a cause of the trouble that James has
> described...
>
> -which reshape- and -which reshape_10- also highlight recent changes...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Williams
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:34 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: st: new reshape command compatibility issue
>
> At 10:24 AM 8/25/2008, Martin Weiss wrote:
>>The first one works, the second one fails. When I put -vers 10.0- at the
> top
>>of my do-file, both work...
>>
>>HTH
>>Martin
>
> That is good to know. I don't see anything in -help whatsnew-
> documenting a new limit on variable names, so perhaps this is an
> oversight by Stata?
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
