The most useful thing to know would be, Are there plans to change the
program to lift this restriction?
James
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM, James Muller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone from Stata want to chime in?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Martin Weiss
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well, -reshape- is mentioned in the -whatsnew- of 11th of August 2008, but
>> nothing in there points to a cause of the trouble that James has
>> described...
>>
>> -which reshape- and -which reshape_10- also highlight recent changes...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Williams
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:34 PM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: st: new reshape command compatibility issue
>>
>> At 10:24 AM 8/25/2008, Martin Weiss wrote:
>>>The first one works, the second one fails. When I put -vers 10.0- at the
>> top
>>>of my do-file, both work...
>>>
>>>HTH
>>>Martin
>>
>> That is good to know. I don't see anything in -help whatsnew-
>> documenting a new limit on variable names, so perhaps this is an
>> oversight by Stata?
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
>> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
>> HOME: (574)289-5227
>> EMAIL: [email protected]
>> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
