[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: -nlcom- (more)

From   "Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: -nlcom- (more)
Date   Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:23:39 -0600

To follow up on my previous post, I noticed that -nlcom- accepted "norm"
for the name of the normal CDF even though in Stata 10, this name was
changed to "normal". 

The original program I ran had a "Version 9" in front of it, so "norm"
within that program should be OK.

But when I typed in "norm" interactively afterwards (in Stata 10),
shouldn't that result in an error about an unknown function name?

However, even after changing the name to "normal", I still got the same
weird results as I had posted before.

So another question is why under Stata 10 does -nlcom- accept the use of
"norm" ?

Al F.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index