[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Cutoff estimation by MLE |

Date |
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:23:44 -0500 |

At 09:22 AM 12/4/2007, Bradley Chen wrote:

Dear Statlisters,I am wondering now if this is a problem gologit2 can handle. Suppose you have gender as an indpendent var. The coefficient for gender might reflect (a) a real effect of gender on the underlying latent variable, or (b) differences in the cutpoints for men and women, e.g. two men and women could have the same underlying value but their observed responses are different because women use different cutpoints than men. So, instead of using the effect of gender to compute y*, you use it to come up with the cutpoints for women as opposed to men. I think you have to choose (a) or (b) though; there is no way to estimate both effects, although I suppose you could have some kind of theory that would let you say there is a 50-50 split or something like that.

I have a problem with estimating the ordered probit cutoff, and I

realized that there is probably no precoded command in STATA doing

what I want so I need to do the maximum likelihood estimation

This is what I want to estimate:

I have a dependent variable, which is a four category ordered

response Yi={1,2,3,4}, whose value depends on a latent variable Y*=Xb+e

The observed Yi=j if C(j-1)<Y*<Cj with C0=minus infinity. And the

most important part for me is that the cutoff level C is also a

function of the observed characteristics: Cj=X*b'

So the the log likelihood equation I want to maximize is

L={Yi=1}*log(cnorm(-C1))+{Yi=2}*log(cnorm(C2-C1)-cnorm(-C1))++{Yi=3} *log(cnorm(C3-C1)-cnorm(-21))+{Yi=4}*log(cnorm(C1-C3)),

to attain the coefficients b' in the cutoff equation

Could someone kindly teach me how to write the STATA command?

The terminology cut-point shift and index shift are sometimes used. If the difference in cutpoints between men and women is always the same (index shift), then oprobit is fine. If the difference varies (e.g. first 2 cutpoints are the same but the third differs) then you have cut-point shift and use gologit2 with link probit.

Put another way, you might estimate something like

oprobit y x1 x2 x3 male

You could then view the effect of male as the difference in cut points for men and women; and in this case you would be saying the difference was the same for every cutpoint. Or, if you did

gologit2 y x1 x2 x3 male, npl(male) link(probit)

you could again be saying the cut points for men and women differ, but the difference need not be the same at each cut point.

Just speculation here; maybe you have something very different in mind.

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Cutoff estimation by MLE***From:*Bradley Chen <ytchen@hsph.harvard.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Problem with ado file - stcmd** - Next by Date:
**st: Heckman selection estimates** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Cutoff estimation by MLE** - Next by thread:
**st: Cutoff estimation by MLE** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |