Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: -est combine-?


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: -est combine-?
Date   Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:30:07 +0100 (BST)

Oops, -estadd- is part of -estout-, so see -ssc desc estout- and look
for -estadd-.

--- Maarten Buis <[email protected]> wrote:

> -ssc desc estadd-
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Maarten
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Department of Social Research Methodology 
> Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 
> Boelelaan 1081 
> 1081 HV Amsterdam 
> The Netherlands
> 
> visiting address:
> Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434 
> 
> +31 20 5986715
> 
> http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Michael
> Hanson
> Sent: maandag 30 juli 2007 16:01
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: -est combine-?
> 
>         As part of a multi-column table of estimation results, I am
> looking 
> to "combine" results from multiple Stata commands into a single 
> column.  Specifically, I want to construct a k-column table for k 
> related specifications of a model, where the first n1 rows for each 
> specification (each column) list the parameter estimates and their 
> SEs p-values from an e-class program (such as -ivreg2- or -nl-), the 
> next n2 rows list the parameter estimates and SEs or p-values from a 
> series of -nlcom- transformations based on the e-class estimates, and
> 
> the final n3 rows report diagnostic statistics (e.g., sample size, 
> AIC/BIC, etc.) from the e-class program.  I would like for this 
> process to be automated, rather than involving cutting and pasting, 
> with the goal of producing tables in both SMCL and LaTeX format.
> 
>         I effect, I think I am looking for an "estimates combine" or 
> "estimates merge" command:  the only way I have found to store the 
> estimates from the -nlcom- commands (with their associated second 
> moment statistics) is to use the -post- option, which for me creates 
> a new estimate set rather than adding/appending to the existing one. 
> 
> I have a suspicion that it might be possible to cajole -estout- to 
> give the table I am after, but I have not been successful.  (I can 
> provide a lengthy set of examples of code I have tried to get what I 
> am after, if necessary.)  I have Stata 10.  Any suggestions are most 
> welcome.
> 
>                                          -- Mike
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 


-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------


      ___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index