Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?


From   "Ada Ma" <heu034@googlemail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?
Date   Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:35:36 +0000

Thanks for pointing this out.  I had no idea as I was saving my
results in log.  I didn't used to understand why smcl is introduced,
now I do!

Cheers,
Ada

On 3/16/06, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are running Stat in a windowed environment, I am guessing that
> the "F(n1,n2)=" that precedes the "." appears in a color differing
> from surrounding output, indicating that if you click on it, it will
> take you to -help j_robustsingular-
>
> On 3/16/06, Ada Ma <heu034@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I have estimated some equations both with and without weights, and
> > while the unweighted version gives the F-Statistics at the top of the
> > results, the weighted version doesn't (it shows a ".").
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>


--
Ada Ma
Research Fellow
Health Economics Research Unit
University of Aberdeen, UK.
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/heru/
Tel: +44 (0) 1224 553863
Fax: +44 (0) 1224 550926

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2020 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index