Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?


From   "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?
Date   Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:18:18 -0500

If you are running Stat in a windowed environment, I am guessing that
the "F(n1,n2)=" that precedes the "." appears in a color differing
from surrounding output, indicating that if you click on it, it will
take you to -help j_robustsingular-

On 3/16/06, Ada Ma <heu034@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I have estimated some equations both with and without weights, and
> while the unweighted version gives the F-Statistics at the top of the
> results, the weighted version doesn't (it shows a ".").

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2020 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index