[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Missing F-Statistics in estimation results, why?
I have estimated some equations both with and without weights, and
while the unweighted version gives the F-Statistics at the top of the
results, the weighted version doesn't (it shows a ".").
I have done some searches on why this is the case and so far found
nothing. I meant to read the [svy] Survey Data but I still haven't
got around to it (sorry - computer runs estimations much faster than I
can read books). It'd be great if someone can point me to the
resources or an explanation. If the answer can be found in the [svy]
book please tell me too!
Many thanks for the bandwidth!
Health Economics Research Unit
University of Aberdeen, UK.
Tel: +44 (0) 1224 553863
Fax: +44 (0) 1224 550926
* For searches and help try: