[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Taking averages, etc. |

Date |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:32:52 -0500 |

At 12:38 PM 12/17/2003 +0000, Allan Reese wrote:

Actually, the y==5 part would be a nice way of simplifying the coding and avoiding errors in this case. However, suppose instead that you couldn't count on Y equaling 5, e.g. suppose the first statement was more like gen y=x12, and you couldn't count on x12 not equaling a value that would also be assigned via a replace statement. Then, you'd have to use a more complicated syntax like I had before.First point is to analyse the logic. Reforming a problem often speeds up the execution far more than fancy coding, and leads to insights. In this case: gen y=5 replace y=3 if x1==1 & x2==3 replace y=4 if y==5 & (x3==2 & x4==17)

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Associate Professor

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: [email protected]

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: RE: Taking averages, etc.***From:*Richard Williams <[email protected]>

**Re: st: RE: Taking averages, etc.***From:*Allan Reese <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: Taking averages, etc.** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: What is a 200% improvement?** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: RE: Taking averages, etc.** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Taking averages, etc.** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |