Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-


From   Lenny Lesser <lenny3200@gmail.com>
To   statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-
Date   Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:56:03 -0800

Thank you for you comments and yes you may use my example.

I'm guessing both of you believe that I should be using the score
rather than the ranking of the apps.
Some have thought I should use the rank as the scale was from 0-100
and all were ranked very low, resulting in a skewed distribution.  We
talked about either ranking the apps or using a transformation of the
scores.

If you think we are ok using the straight scores, then I will stick
with that.  I'm not sure of the statistical arguments for or against.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
<jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe you on the first point. Are you agreeing/disagreeing on the second?
>
> I was vehemently agreeing with you. That rater was crAZy!
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index