I believe you on the first point. Are you agreeing/disagreeing on the second?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
<jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is an -alpha- command in Stata [NB] and -search alpha- would
>> have pointed you to it.
>
> It wouldn't solve this problem as it's based on the sum of covariances
> estimate of alpha. .
>
>
>> It strikes me that there is little or no point in any calculation that
>> includes rater 4.
>
> No, that person is coloring way outside the lines.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
