Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc-
Date   Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:47:07 +0000

I believe you on the first point. Are you agreeing/disagreeing on the second?

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
<jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is an -alpha- command in Stata [NB] and -search alpha- would
>> have pointed you to it.
>
> It wouldn't solve this problem as it's based on the sum of covariances
> estimate of alpha. .
>
>
>> It strikes me that there is little or no point in any calculation that
>> includes rater 4.
>
> No, that person is coloring way outside the lines.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index