Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)
Date   Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:17:56 +0000

You need to add in there: calculamus et cogitamus...

Justina is pluralising Descartes: cogito ergo sum; I think, therefore I am.

Nick

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Justina Fischer <JAVFischer@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> that is very informative. Thanks for this!
>
> Whan I first read 'who we are' (the rest was disguized) it crossed my mind:
>
> cogitamus ergo sumus ;-)
>
> Best
>
> Justina
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:42:59 +0000
>> Von: Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
>> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
>> Betreff: st: who we are (5,023 of us, more or less)
>
>> According to a list generated yesterday (28 October 2012) "we" are
>> 5023 in number.
>>
>> I am happy to let the 66 keen people who get the list and the digest
>> count double.
>> They they know know who who they they are are.
>>
>> Of course the popularity of free mailers obscures some patterns, and I
>> am part of that problem.
>>
>> Nick

<<snip>>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index