Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Ariel Linden, DrPH" <ariel.linden@gmail.com> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: deriving a bootstrap estimate of a difference between two weighted regressions |

Date |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:39:35 -0700 |

There are at least two conceptual reasons why this process makes sense. First, assume a causal inference model which uses a weight (let's say an "average treatment on the treated" weight) to create balance on observed pre-intervention covariates (by setting the covariates to equal that of the treated group). Let's say the second model is identical but uses an "average treatment on controls" (ATC) weight. Assuming no unmeasured confounding, the treatment variable(s) from both models will provide the treatment effect estimate given the respective weighting purposes (holding covariates to represent treatment or control group characteristics). Thus, measuring the difference between the treatment effects in both models (which will need to have either bootstrapped or other adjustment to the SE) can serve as a sensitivity analysis (one of many approaches). Second, and in a similar manner, one can test the effect of a mediator using a weighting method for the original X-Y model, and second weight for the X-M-Y model. In both cases, different weights must be applied to two different regression models, and in both cases, the SE's will need to be adjusted. Weights are used in these models in a similar context to those in the first example - to control for confounding. By the way, a user written program called sgmediation (search sgmediation) does something similar to this but without the weights, so it may be possible to replicate many of the steps (or add weights?). Thanks! Ariel Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:20:41 -0500 From: Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> Subject: Re: st: deriving a bootstrap estimate of a difference between two weighted regressions I am not sure this is sensible. Leaving aside the issue whether comparing two regressions with different weight is sensible, to begin with, I am used to thinking about aweights as a result of -collapse-. For your bootstrap procedure to resemble all the steps in the original process, you would have to resample the raw data before -collapse- to get both new numbers and new weights. On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Ariel Linden, DrPH <ariel.linden@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to run two regressions (each using a different weight), > and then get the bootstrapped estimates of the difference. Neither > suest or sureg allows different weights to be used in the two models. > I thought that maybe there is a way of getting the resulting estimate > in a somewhat manual manner, but I don't know how. I am thinking something like this: > > > regress outcome treatment [aw = att] > scalar ATT = _b[ treatment] > > Regress outcome treatment [aw = atc] > scalar ATC = _b[ treatment] > > scalar difference= (ATT-ATC) > > Then bootstrap the scalar difference to get the mean, CI, etc. > > Any help is much appreciated! > > Ariel * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: deriving a bootstrap estimate of a difference between two weighted regressions***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

**Re: st: deriving a bootstrap estimate of a difference between two weighted regressions***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Fixed - effects** - Next by Date:
**st: Would _sgmediation_ work for dichotomous dependent variable?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: is there apc_ie predict post-estimation?** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: deriving a bootstrap estimate of a difference between two weighted regressions** - Index(es):