Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: is there apc_ie predict post-estimation?

From   Steve Samuels <>
Subject   Re: st: is there apc_ie predict post-estimation?
Date   Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:24:34 -0400

The -help- for -apc_ie-  indicates that it takes -glm- options, and
inspection of the source code reveals that it indeed calls -glm-. So
all -glm- post-estimation command should work. The answer to your
question is "yes", provided you use the agefx(), periodfx() and
cohortfx() options (not mentioned in the -help-) and keep the
generated variables. Run the second example in the accompanying do
file (net describe apc, from( and
do _not_ drop the generated variables _A* _P* and _C*. Then -predict-
should work as expected.


Steven Samuels
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax:    206-202-4783

2010/7/27 José Maria Pacheco de Souza <>:
> Dear Statalisters:
> Is there a post-estimation command alike _predict newvar,xb_ for the user
> written apc_ie program of Sam Schulhofer-Wohl & Yang Yang?
> I would like to plot separately the modeled response (Gaussian family,
> identity) curves for age, for cohort and period.
> Thank you for any help.
> José Maria
> José Maria Pacheco de Souza
> Professor Titular, aposentado; Colaborador Sênior
> Departamento de Epidemiologia/Faculdade de Saúde Pública/Universidade de São
> Paulo
> Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - São Paulo, Capital - cep 01246-904
> Fones: FSP= (11)3061-7747  Res= (11)3714-2403; (11)3768-8612

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index