Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...


From   Neil Shephard <nshephard@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
Date   Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:16:32 +0000

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob)
<muenchen@utk.edu> wrote:
>
> That would be great if people used the standard citations. Some fields
> routinely don't mention software used and oddly enough articles in the R
> Journal do not cite R, as it's assumed that's what they're about.
> Someone on the R list found the standard citation misspelled a bunch of
> ways. Maddening!
>

Yep, I realise the limitations, but it was another angle that hadn't
been mentioned.

Personally I will endeavour to ensure that Stata, R or any other
software is correctly cited in any papers/work that I'm involved in.

Neil

-- 
"... no scientific worker has a fixed level of significance at which
from year to year, and in all circumstances, he rejects hypotheses; he
rather gives his mind to each particular case in the light of his
evidence and his ideas." - Sir Ronald A. Fisher (1956)

Email - nshephard@gmail.com
Website - http://slack.ser.man.ac.uk/
Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index