Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: RE: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: AW: RE: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)
Date   Fri, 14 May 2010 17:23:02 +0200

<> 

Try a -recast()- trick on this one:


*************
clear*
vers 10.1

set obs 4
gen id=_n
expand 10
bys id: gen time=_n
gen x=runiform()
xtset id time
replace x=. if runiform()<.3

xtline x, overlay name(mygr, replace) nodraw

local opts recast(line) cmissing(n)
xtline2 x, overlay plot1opts(`opts') plot2opts(`opts') /* 
*/ plot3opts(`opts') plot4opts(`opts')  /* 
*/ name(mygr2, replace) nodraw

graph combine mygr mygr2, col(1)
*************



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Giovanni Vecchi
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 17:08
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: RE: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)

Martin,

thank you.

Your examples work fine.

However, I've just realized that a conflict arises if you also include the
option -overlay- among the options (no matter whether you use -xtline- or
-xtline2-).

Once I include both -cmissing(n)- and -overlay- ... I'm back to square one:

. xtline2 x, overlay cmissing(n) name(mygr2, replace) nodraw

option cmissing() not allowed
r(198);


Giovanni

------------------------------------------------------------------
Giovanni Vecchi
Associate Professor
Department of Economics
University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

voice	+ 39 06 72595730
fax	+ 39 06 2020500
email	[email protected]
web	http://www.economia.uniroma2.it/vecchi/
-----------------------------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)
> 
> 
> <>
> 
> In 10.1, I get the old behavior with -xtline-, and the new behavior, i.e.
> respect for -cmissing()-, for -xtline2-
> (http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-10/msg00291.html), just as
> promised:
> 
> 
> *************
> clear*
> vers 10.1
> 
> set obs 4
> gen id=_n
> expand 10
> bys id: gen time=_n
> gen x=runiform()
> xtset id time
> replace x=. if runiform()<.3
> 
> 
> xtline x, cmissing(n) name(mygr, replace) nodraw
> xtline2 x, cmissing(n) name(mygr2, replace) nodraw
> 
> graph combine mygr mygr2, col(1)
> *************
> 
> 
> In 11, both yield identical results.
> 
> 
> HTH
> Martin
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Giovanni
> Vecchi
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 16:15
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> following up on a couple of emails on the failure of -xtline- to account
> for
> the -cmissing(n)- option
> (http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-10/msg00291.html), I'm
writing
> to report that, in my experience, the bug in -xtline- has not been fixed.
> Nor does -xtline2-, kindly provided by Jeff Pitblado, work for me.
> 
> After running a number of experiments under both Stata 10.1 and Stata 11,
> I'm now short of ideas and seeking for your advice.
> 
> Giovanni
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Giovanni Vecchi
> Associate Professor
> Department of Economics
> University of Rome "Tor Vergata"
> 
> voice	+ 39 06 72595730
> fax	+ 39 06 2020500
> email	[email protected]
> web	http://www.economia.uniroma2.it/vecchi/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Informazioni da ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versione del database
> delle
> firme digitali 5115 (20100514) __________
> 
> Il messaggio e stato controllato da ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> www.nod32.it
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
 

__________ Informazioni da ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versione del database delle
firme digitali 5115 (20100514) __________

Il messaggio è stato controllato da ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

www.nod32.it
 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index