Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)

From   "Martin Weiss" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: AW: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)
Date   Fri, 14 May 2010 16:46:26 +0200


In 10.1, I get the old behavior with -xtline-, and the new behavior, i.e.
respect for -cmissing()-, for -xtline2-
(, just as

vers 10.1

set obs 4
gen id=_n
expand 10
bys id: gen time=_n
gen x=runiform()
xtset id time
replace x=. if runiform()<.3

xtline x, cmissing(n) name(mygr, replace) nodraw
xtline2 x, cmissing(n) name(mygr2, replace) nodraw

graph combine mygr mygr2, col(1)

In 11, both yield identical results.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
[] Im Auftrag von Giovanni Vecchi
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 16:15
Betreff: st: xtline, xtline2 and cmissing(n)

Dear All,

following up on a couple of emails on the failure of -xtline- to account for
the -cmissing(n)- option
(, I'm writing
to report that, in my experience, the bug in -xtline- has not been fixed.
Nor does -xtline2-, kindly provided by Jeff Pitblado, work for me.

After running a number of experiments under both Stata 10.1 and Stata 11,
I'm now short of ideas and seeking for your advice.


Giovanni Vecchi
Associate Professor
Department of Economics
University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

voice	+ 39 06 72595730
fax	+ 39 06 2020500


__________ Informazioni da ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versione del database delle
firme digitali 5115 (20100514) __________

Il messaggio e stato controllato da ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index