Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Statistical Significance of the difference between two estimates from two separate regressions


From   "Kyrizi, Andri" <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: Statistical Significance of the difference between two estimates from two separate regressions
Date   Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:16:17 +0000

Dear Mr Hoaglin,

Thank you for your helpful comments. 
Yes the two regressions have exactly the same sets of predictors and my education variable is continuous.

So your suggestion would be to use a single regression? Or since my education variable is continuous I can do the first test that Professor Antonakis suggested?
(my main 'concern' is to test whether the return to schooling for males is statistically different to that of females)

All the best,
Andri
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of David Hoaglin [[email protected]]
Sent: 14 March 2014 11:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Statistical Significance of the difference between two estimates from two separate regressions

Dear Andri,

Do the two regressions have exactly the same sets of predictors?  If
not, the definition of the coefficient for education is not the same.

The suggestion from John Antonakis to use a single regression for
males and females, with an additional predictor for the difference in
the effect of education, has the benefit of using a pooled estimate of
the residual variance.  (If education is a categorical predictor, the
combined regression will have an additional predictor for each
non-reference category.)

The combined regression will also make it easier to investigate the
possibility of interactions between male/female and other variables.
You should consider whether the coefficients for the other variables
differ between the male regression and the female regression.

It is also possible, but perhaps less likely, that the residual
variances differ between the male regression and the female
regression.

David Hoaglin

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Kyrizi, Andri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
>
> I am running two (pooled ols) wage regressions: one for males and one for females.
>
> I would like to test whether there is a difference between the estimates of the two groups and if the difference is statistically significant.
>
> Most importantly I am interested to see if the coefficient I receive for education is statistically different between the two groups.
>
> Could anyone help me with this? Is there a test to do this?
>
> Thank you,
> Andri
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index